Which System Do You Build When You Can Only Build One?Issue #34 I could build five systems right now. Each one would add $2M-$5M or more in revenue capacity over the next three years. But I can’t build them all at once. Between staff capacity, training requirements, budget approvals, and my own bandwidth, doing everything is a recipe for doing nothing. So the real question isn’t what we should build. It’s what do we build first. This is System Six: Systems Investment — deciding which technology to fix first when you can’t fix everything. The Portfolio That Can't ScaleMy Director of Individual Giving currently has 1,000 prospects in her major gifts portfolio. That isn't just difficult; it’s humanly impossible. We both know the textbook solution: Focus on the 50 who are ready to close. But the question that stops us is, “What happens to the other 950?” They aren't cold prospects. They screen well, they've engaged, and they’ve made smaller gifts. We can’t ignore them, but we simply can’t manage them manually. That’s why I’m building the engagement funnel first. Why This Build Comes FirstSure, the engagement funnel solves the immediate headache: A gift officer buried under 1,000 prospects who needs to focus on her top 50. But it does something even more important. It proves the model. If automated engagement can move 950 major gift prospects through a pipeline—and surface signals that tell us exactly when someone is ready to close—then the dominoes start to fall:
This isn’t just solving today’s constraint. It’s building the template for the next $35M. The Four Questions for Choosing Your First BuildThis is how I’m making Systems Investment decisions right now. It’s not just about ROI; it’s about proof and risk. 1. Does it solve an immediate crisis and enable future growth? Some builds are strategic but not urgent. Others are urgent bandages that lead to dead ends. The right first build does both.
2. Can you build it with what you already have? First builds should rely on existing infrastructure with small additions. We already have the CRM, email automation, and segmentation tools; this just requires content and modest spend. Compare that to a national brand campaign which requires consultants, CEO time, and cross-department coordination.
3. Do you have an internal champion ready to validate success? Some systems require dragging skeptical teams along. Others have a natural owner. My gift officer knows her current portfolio is broken. She’s ready to try this—she just needs reassurance that the other 950 won’t disappear.
4. Does this build train your team for what comes next? My team has never used engagement funnels. If we started with corporate capture, they’d be learning on cold prospects where the stakes (and risks) are high. By starting with major gifts, they learn the mechanics with people they already know.
Why This Isn't an ROI ExerciseEvery one of my five options has a strong ROI. The brand campaign probably has the biggest long-term upside, and the corporate program scales fastest. But I’m not building any of those first. Because the real question isn’t “Which system has the best ROI?” It’s “Which system proves the operating model with the lowest risk, so everything else gets easier?” For me, that’s the major gifts engagement funnel. What to Test This WeekIf you’re stuck between multiple good builds:
Coming Next WeekYou know what to build. But how do you get it done when urgent work keeps winning? Next Sunday: System Seven — Quarterly Planning The 90-day framework that turns strategy into completed systems. Your TurnThere’s a system on your list that keeps getting pushed to “later.” What is it—and what keeps it from being first? Reply and let me know. I’d love to think it through with you. Until next week, P.S. This issue is part of my Chief Fundraiser Operating System series — practical systems I’m building inside my operation to protect focus and scale revenue. If this one was useful, you’ll want the earlier systems too. You can find the full series here. I’m Christine Bork, Chief Development Officer at the American Academy of Pediatrics. I write Chief Fundraiser Weekly to share what I’m learning as I lead a growing team and try to do the work in a way that’s sustainable and thoughtful. |
You know how to fundraise. What you're dealing with now — pressure, the team, strategic decisions — that's not in any newsletter. So I started writing it down. Sundays. Free.
The System That Keeps Strategy Alive Issue #404-minute read Hi Reader, I realized something uncomfortable. If I stepped away, our execution would soften. The team would keep working. Meetings would still happen. Revenue would come in. But the strategy would drift because it lived in my head. Not in the system. We didn't have a scorecard. We didn't have a planning rhythm that the whole team could see. We had instinct. That's how a lot of development operations run. The leader isn't weak. The...
Your Forecast Won't Warn You Issue #394-minute read Hi Reader, Two years ago, we learned something the hard way. A corporate donor surprised us by deciding not to renew a seven-figure partnership. By the time it hit the dashboard, the window for recovery was already closing. The system wasn’t broken. It just didn’t warn us. Most fundraising dashboards are built to measure what happened. Very few are built to surface where you’re exposed. That difference matters when conditions change. Why...
Your Portfolio Is Shaping How Your Team Thinks Issue #384-minute read Hi Reader, Last week, I asked why board connections stall. A — They don't know the prospect well enough and won't admit it. B — They know them, but the ask feels too risky. Here's what those of you who replied said: mostly A. Board connections stall for the same reason portfolios stall. Wrong design. Not wrong people. Let's start with a question. What is your portfolio actually built to produce? Revenue - of course. But, is...